nex-tagma

Standard reference implementation that consumes the Tagma coordinate space on top of neXus FIH storage

Author
Affiliation

SSCCS Foundation

Published

July, 2026

Abstract

nex-tagma is the nexus-tagma hub, a standard reference implementation that bridges the Tagma three-axis coordinate space and the neXus FIH three-dimensional storage. It demonstrates that the O(1) direct addressing, collision-free uniqueness, axis decomposition, and proximity properties of the Tagma coordinate system form an isomorphic mapping with the Fact-Inference-Hint three-dimensional cube. Every valid 16-bit Coord becomes a first-class coordinate in FIH storage.

nex-tagma serves as a bridge and an experimental ground for neXus core refactoring. Design decisions and structural insights gained here flow directly into formalize FIH coordinate system. The rationale for refactoring the current hash-based multi-index storage model into a native 3D cube addressing scheme is supplied by the empirical data—latency benchmarks, collision properties, and axis slicing performance—generated at each evolutionary stage of nex-tagma.

Source
Other Formats

Identity

nex-tagma is a bridge that applies the three-axis coordinate system of Tagma to the FIH (Fact-Inference-Hint) three-dimensional storage structure of neXus. Design decisions and insights obtained here grow directly into the rationale for refactoring the nex core (Issue #139 – formalize FIH coordinate system).

Identity flow across three layers:

Figure 1: Identity flow: tagma-core provides the coordinate space, nex-tagma connects it to FIH storage, and insights feed back into nex refactoring

The linguistic equation is no coincidence: co-ordinare (to arrange together) = syn-tagma (that which is arranged together) declares that the Tagma project is the necessary realization of the Coord mechanism.

Three-Dimensional Structure Mapping

The correspondence of the three Tagma axes to the three FIH dimensions is structural, not metaphorical:

Tagma Axis FIH Dimension Question
Axis 0 (origin) origin Where did the fact come from?
Axis 1 (creator) creator Who created it?
Axis 2 (type) type What kind of fact is it?

Every valid (origin, creator, type) combination is encoded as one Tagma coordinate, mapped directly into an O(1) slot of the three-dimensional index. This is structurally superior to the existing hash-based multi-index approach (by_origin ∩ by_creator ∩ by_type → O(K)), because the coordinate space guarantees constant-time addressing without index intersection or bitmap maintenance.

The mapping uses the full coordinate space: 19 × 21 × 28 = 11,172 addressable coordinates per Coord. Each coordinate is a native Unicode scalar value, not an opaque hash. For multi-dimensional addressing, multiple coords compose into a CoordPath of arbitrary length, where each dimension occupies one Coord position rather than one axis within a Coord:

Property Transfer

The structural properties of the Tagma coordinate space transfer directly to FIH storage:

Property Tagma Coordinate FIH Storage Application
O(1) direct addressing C(i,m,f) = BASE + 588i + 28m + f storage[F][I][H]
Collision-free coordinate = uniqueness guarantee same (F,I,H) combination always the same slot
Axis decomposition to_axes() → individual fields extract Fact only, extract Inference only, etc.
Proximity search hamming_distance() similar fact/inference/hint O(1) exploration
Built-in validation valid coordinate range embedded in type system invalid FIH combinations structurally impossible

All fact/inference/hint combinations map to a single three-dimensional cube, and the cube’s O(1) access + axis decomposition + proximity search connect directly to the detection tasks of the OODA scheduler (gap identification, contradiction detection, state-change sensing).

Figure 2: Property transfer: each Tagma structural property maps isomorphically to an FIH storage operation

Performance Benchmarks

The following Criterion benchmark results were measured on ARMv8.4-A Firestorm from the nex crate benchmark suite (cargo bench -p nex). They compare the Tagma CoordSpaceN direct-address index (by_origin_creator fast path) against the legacy HashMap Vec intersection (fallback) at three data scales.

2-Axis Exist Query (origin X creator)

Scale Tagma Legacy HashMap Intersection Ratio
10K facts, 100x100 grid 65.7 ns 3.12 us (Vec=100) 47x
100K facts, 200x500 grid 61.6 ns 12.2 us (Vec=500) 198x
500K facts, 500x2000 grid 59.8 ns 12.9 us (Vec=1000) 215x

Tagma cost is flat at ~60 ns regardless of data volume. Legacy cost grows linearly with axis cardinality: each additional 10x data multiplies the intersection cost by the Vec size.

Nonexist Query

Type Scale Tagma Legacy Behavior
Fake nonexist (axis missing) 10K 36 ns 39 ns Both short-circuit
Real nonexist (combo missing) 500K 199 ns 169 ns Legacy still iterates Vec

Fake nonexist (one axis value has zero entries) is fast for both because the HashMap returns empty Vec in O(1). Real nonexist (both axes exist but the specific combination does not) is where the asymmetry appears: Legacy still fetches both Vecs (1000 + 250 entries) and allocates a HashSet before finding nothing, while Tagma returns None at array access time.

Single-Axis HashMap (Baseline)

Operation Latency
fact_ids_by_origin 91 ns
facts_by_creator 92 ns

Single-axis HashMap lookups remain the fastest path for simple queries. Tagma does not replace them – it replaces the multi-axis intersection.

Key Insight: Tagma Stays Flat

Tagma:  10K -> 100K -> 500K
        65ns   62ns    60ns    (flat)

Legacy: 10K -> 100K -> 500K
        3us   12us    13us     (linear growth)

As data grows to millions, Tagma remains at ~60 ns. Legacy continues to climb: 10M facts would push Vec intersection to hundreds of microseconds. The advantage is structural – direct array addressing vs Vec scan is not an implementation detail but a complexity class difference.

Evolution Stages

nex-tagma evolves in stages, with each stage building on the previous and simultaneously feeding insights back to the nex core:

Stage Content Status
1 Independent PoC – own coord.rs, SHA256 comparison benchmarks Complete (#150)
2 tagma-core dependency – reuse Coord type, remove own coord.rs Complete (#151 Phase 1a)
3 nex storage integration – Tagma index on FIH storage Complete (#151 Phase 1a)
4 3D cube index experiments – axis slicing, proximity search, OODA integration In Progress
5 Insight feedback → nex refactoring (#139 FIH coordinate system formalization) In Progress

Stage 1 (complete) established the baseline: a single Tagma coordinate is ~600x (0.38 ns vs 227 ns) faster than SHA256 for identity generation, with native axis decomposition and collision-free properties.

Stage 2 (complete) replaced the standalone PoC with the tagma-core library (#![no_std], zero OS dependencies), adding CoordSpaceN for N-dimensional fixed-depth addressing and DynCoordSpace for recursive variable-depth addressing with Slot::Both (value + child subtree at the same coordinate).

Stage 3 (complete) introduced CoordSpaceN<3, FihHash> as the multi-axis index inside FihCoord (~40 lines added). The storage IO layer, record types, FihHash serialization, and the Blackboard trait surface remain unchanged. Legacy HashMap indexes are preserved for backward compatibility and single-axis queries. The change replaces 3-Vec intersection with a direct CoordPath lookup.

Stage 4 is active: axis-slice queries, proximity search via Hamming distance, and OODA scheduler integration using the new index.